![]() ![]() It brings them up to the level of actual 4K video quality, as expected by streamers and video game enthusiasts. Sony states that this feature enhances the resolution of lower-quality videos, like high-definition movies, standard-definition TV shows, and older video games without 4K support. Image: KnowTechieįirst, the top-of-the-line A95L will offer a new feature called XR Clear Image, which will detect the video quality and resolution of source material like TV shows, movies, and video games, and improve the quality of the video on the fly if it is needed. It wasn’t entirely clear why Sony decided to unveil the TV sets in March, but they come with a number of incremental improvements. Sony typically announces new TV models at the annual Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, but the electronic maker decided this year to delay its announcement for two months. On Monday, Sony announced its new line of A95L QD-OLED TVs will become available for pre-order on August 21st, with three models offered at various price points: The lessors had earlier told the single judge that denial of deregistration by the DGCA was “illegitimate”.Sony has revealed just how much streamers, gamers, and movie fans will have to pay if they want to grab one of the brand’s newest and best TVs this year. With a moratorium in force on financial obligations and transfer of assets of Go First in the wake of the insolvency resolution proceedings, the lessors are unable to deregister and take back the aircraft leased to the carrier. ![]() On May 10, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted the airline's voluntary insolvency resolution petition and appointed Abhilash Lal as the interim resolution professional to manage the carrier. While granting interim relief on July 5, the single judge had asked the DGCA to permit the lessors, their employees, and agents to access the airport where their aircraft is currently parked and to inspect.Įarlier, the NCLT-appointed resolution professional, tasked with managing Go First, had told the high court that returning aircraft to the lessors will render the airline, which has 7,000 employees to look after, "dead". The July 5 order was challenged by the RP before the division bench which had permitted the airline to carry out maintenance of aircraft leased to it while allowing the lessors to inspect the planes periodically.ĭuring the hearing on Thursday, the counsel for the RP of the airline informed the high court that they have challenged the division bench's July 12 order before the Supreme Court. The order by the single judge was passed on petitions by several lessors seeking de-registration of their planes by aviation regulator DGCA so they could take them back from the airline. In an interim order passed on July 5, the single judge had allowed the lessors to inspect their aircraft at least twice a month and carry out the maintenance work. The counsel for the RP submitted that there was urgency to enable the aircraft to be flight ready in terms of the Resumption Plan as approved by the DGCA on July 21 and Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) also required the airline to undertake handling or maintenance flights satisfactorily. The plea said in the July 5 order, the court had passed directions that once the process of deregistration of aircraft has begun, the planes cannot be flown. ![]() ![]() The interim order was passed on an application filed by SMBC Aviation Capital Limited, one of the lessors of aircraft, submitting that disregarding the earlier directions of the court, the RP has flown 2 aircraft owned by the petitioners without court's permission. Thus, respondent no.9/ RP of Go Airlines cannot be permitted at this stage, to continue with these handling/maintenance flights,” Justice Ganju said. “Prima facie, the term - scheduled maintenance cannot be understood to include flying the aircraft even if it is a non-commercial flight. “The respondent no.9/ RP of Go Airlines has also not been able to show any urgency or any grave imminent threat to these aircraft to suddenly and without any prior notice, compel the respondent no.9 RP to fly these aircraft. The high court termed as “misconceived” the contention of the RP that 2 of the 10 aircraft have been flown by Go Airlines as these were handling flights forming part of the scheduled maintenance activity for an aircraft. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |